Guide to Understand Load Balancing: Types and How They Work

Load balancing is an essential component of modern web application architecture, providing improved reliability, performance, and availability by distributing incoming network traffic evenly across multiple servers. There are several types of load balancers, each with its own unique features and capabilities. In this blog post, we’ll discuss the different types of load balancers and how they work internally.

Hardware Load Balancer

Hardware load balancers are physical devices that are dedicated to the task of load balancing. These devices are typically installed in data centers and are connected to the network infrastructure. They work by intercepting incoming traffic and distributing it evenly across multiple servers, ensuring that no single server becomes overwhelmed with requests. Hardware load balancers are often used in large, mission-critical web applications and are typically more expensive than software-based load balancers.

Software Load Balancer

Software load balancers are virtual load-balancing solutions that run on standard server hardware. These solutions can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, and they provide similar functionality to hardware load balancers. Software load balancers are often more flexible and cost-effective than hardware load balancers, and they can be used in a wide range of web applications, from small to large.

Application Load Balancer

Application load balancers are a type of load balancing that operates at the application layer of the OSI model. These load balancers use application-layer information, such as HTTP headers, to make load-balancing decisions. This type of load balancing provides more sophisticated and flexible balancing algorithms, making it ideal for applications that require content-based routing or session persistence.

Pros of using Application Load Balancer(ALB)

Autoscaling: ALBs can be used with AWS Autoscaling, allowing you to automatically scale your application or website in response to changes in traffic load.

Application-level health checks: ALBs support application-level health checks, which can help ensure that traffic is only routed to healthy instances of your application or website.

Multi-protocol support: ALBs support multiple protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, making them ideal for modern web applications that require real-time communication.

Improved security: ALBs provide additional security features, such as SSL/TLS termination and encryption, to help protect your application or website from attacks and data breaches.

Advanced routing features: ALBs support advanced routing features, such as content-based routing and host-based routing, which can help optimize traffic distribution and improve the performance of your application or website.

Cons of using Application Load Balancer

• Potential for a single point of failure: Depending on your network topology, an ALB may become a single point of failure in your infrastructure. This means that if the load balancer fails, traffic may not be able to reach your backend servers until the load balancer is restored.
• Limited layer 4 functionality: ALBs are primarily designed for layer 7 load balancing, so they may not provide advanced layer 4 functionality, such as direct server return.
• Potential performance impact: ALBs may introduce a small amount of latency or overhead, which can impact the performance of your application or website, especially if you are serving large volumes of traffic.

Network Load Balancer

Network load balancers are a type of load balancing that operates at the transport layer of the OSI model. These load balancers use network information, such as IP addresses and port numbers, to make load-balancing decisions. Network load balancing is simple and fast, making it ideal for applications that require high performance and low latency.

Pros of using Network Load balancer

Simplified management: Network load balancers can be managed centrally, allowing you to configure and monitor your load balancers from a single console or dashboard.

Cost-effective: Network load balancers can be a cost-effective solution for load balancing, as they typically require less hardware and can scale easily to handle changing traffic loads.

High throughput: Network load balancers are designed to handle high levels of network traffic and provide high throughput, making them ideal for use in high-performance computing environments.

Low latency: Network load balancers can help reduce latency by routing traffic directly to backend servers, rather than sending traffic through a proxy or other intermediary.

Cons of using Network Load Balancer

Limited support for protocols: Network load balancers may not support all protocols, which can limit their usefulness in certain environments.

Limited layer 7 functionality: Network load balancers typically focus on layer 4 load balancing, which means they may not provide advanced layer 7 functionality, such as content-based routing or application-layer security.

Complexity: Network load balancers can be complex to configure and manage, especially if you are not familiar with networking concepts and protocols.

Limited geographic distribution: Network load balancers may not be able to provide load balancing across multiple geographic regions, which can limit their usefulness in global environments

DNS Load Balancer

DNS load balancing is a type of load balancing that uses the Domain Name System (DNS) to distribute incoming traffic across multiple servers. The DNS server returns multiple IP addresses for a single domain name, and the client’s browser selects the appropriate server based on its own algorithms. DNS load balancing is a simple and cost-effective way to distribute traffic, but it is not as sophisticated or flexible as other types of load balancing.

Pros of using DND Load Balancer

No single point of failure: With traditional load balancers, there is often a single point of failure that can cause downtime if the load balancer fails. With a DNS load balancer, there is no single point of failure, as the DNS records can be replicated across multiple DNS servers to provide redundancy.

Improved flexibility: DNS load balancing allows you to quickly and easily add or remove servers from your pool, as you can simply update the DNS records to reflect the changes. This makes it easier to scale your infrastructure up or down as needed.

Better performance: DNS load balancing can help improve the performance of your application or website by distributing traffic across multiple servers. This can help reduce the load on each server, which can improve response times and reduce the risk of server overload.

Improved security: DNS load balancers can help improve the security of your infrastructure by allowing you to distribute traffic across multiple data centers or regions. This can help mitigate the risk of DDoS attacks, as traffic can be redirected to different locations to help absorb the attack.

Cost-effectiveness: DNS load balancers are often more cost-effective than traditional load balancers, as they do not require expensive hardware or software licenses. Additionally, they can help reduce the cost of downtime by providing improved availability and redundancy.

Cons of using DNS Load Balancers

Limited control: With DNS load balancing, you have less control over how traffic is distributed compared to traditional load balancers. This is because DNS load balancing relies on the DNS system to distribute traffic, which can be less precise than other load balancing methods.

Higher latency: DNS load balancing can result in higher latency compared to other load balancing methods, as the DNS resolution process can add additional overhead to the request/response cycle.

Caching issues: DNS records are often cached by clients and intermediate DNS servers, which can result in clients continuing to use a DNS record that points to a server that is no longer available. This can result in requests being sent to a server that is offline or experiencing issues.

Security concerns: DNS load balancing can introduce security concerns, as attackers can attempt to hijack DNS records or perform DNS cache poisoning attacks to redirect traffic to malicious servers.

Limited fault tolerance: While DNS load balancing can provide redundancy and fault tolerance, it may not be able to handle more complex failure scenarios, such as failures that occur at the application or database layer.

How Load Balancers Works

Regardless of the type of load balancer, the basic process of load balancing is similar. Load balancers receive incoming network traffic and use a set of algorithms to distribute the traffic evenly across multiple servers. The load balancer uses a variety of information, such as the source IP address, destination IP address, and port number, to make load-balancing decisions.

Once the load balancer has determined the appropriate server to route the request to, it establishes a connection with that server and forwards the request. The server processes the request and returns a response, which the load balancer forwards back to the client.